Skip to main content

Wells v. Wells

Citations

  • 168 N.W.2d 54
  • 1969 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 822

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding “the issue of custody here presented [in] the original decree was not final” because the parties “stipulated, with court approval, [that] the matter of custodial rights be subject to review on application of either party . . . without any change of circumstance showing”
  • determining jurisdiction was reserved when the stipulation stated “[t]he matter of custody of the children herein provided for may be reviewed at the request of either party . . . and without the burden on either party of having to show change in circumstances”
  • stipulation of parties and language of decree clearly demonstrate intent to modify without requiring a change of circumstances.
  • stipulation of parties and language of decree clearly demonstrate intent to modify without requiring a change of circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rawlings

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.