Wells v. Wells

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that spouse “did not challenge this provision either before or after it was incorporated into the final judgment”
• declining to consider an argument raised for the first time in a contempt proceeding that a provision of the marital settlement agreement was unconscionable
• upholding requirement that husband transfer his interest in marital home if he made child support payment late
• \[T]he agreement settling the dissolution of marriage litigation was not subject to a `fair and reasonable' inquiry by the court.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Williams v. Williams
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-10-20· cited 5×
• Palmer v. Palmer
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-02-18· cited 3×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Casto v. Casto
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1987-06-30· cited 108×
• Chastain v. Chastain
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1954-05-25· cited 52×
• Petracca v. Petracca
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-02-18· cited 24×
• Burke v. Burke
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-09-10· cited 19×
• Macar v. Macar
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-12-06· cited 17×
• Robinson v. Robinson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-06-20· cited 4×