Skip to main content
· 1/19/1994

Wells v. Uvex Winter Optical, Inc.

Citations

  • 635 A.2d 1188
  • 27 A.L.R. 5th 807
  • 9 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 264
  • 1994 R.I. LEXIS 8
  • 1994 WL 11644

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that, even though an erroneous jury instruction required that there be a new trial, the Court would proceed to address certain other issues in order to establish “some guidelines for the new trial”
  • quot ing the instruction given in Redgrave

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.