Wells v. Turnage

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the plaintiffs’ § 1981 claims based on conduct occurring more than four years before the date they filed the complaint were time-barred
• holding that identification of a single comparator suffices at the pleading stage
• holding that identification of a single comparator suffices at the pleading stage
• noting that “[r]etaliation claims brought under the NYCHRL are . . . subject to a lower standard” than section 1981 and NYSHRL retaliation claims
• declining to address at the dismissal phase whether a collective bargaining agreement is a basis other than sex for payment disparities
• analyzing § 1981 and § 1983 hostile work environment claims under the same standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).