Skip to main content

Wells v. State

Citations

  • 881 So. 2d 54
  • 2004 WL 1837892

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that prejudice was sufficiently alleged because the State may not have been entitled to a recapture period
  • finding sufficient prejudice alleged because state may not have been entitled to recapture window because defendant was not notified or re- arrested on charges
  • reversing summary denial where the State’s notice of refiling of charges, though sent within speedy trial period, was sent to an incorrect address and did not constitute sufficient notice to afford the State the fifteen-day recapture window

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.