Wells v. Roper
Citations
- 246 U.S. 335
- 38 S. Ct. 317
- 62 L. Ed. 755
- 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1553
Syllabus
<p>The First Assistant Postmaster General, in accordance with a decision of the Postmaster General, undertook to terminate an existing contract for automobile mail service at Washington, D. C., to make place for a similar service to be conducted by the Department under a special appropriation, his action being based upon the supposed authority of the contract itself and being purely official, discretionary, and within the scope of his duties. Held, that a suit to restrain. him from annulling the contract and from interfering with its further performance was in effect a suit against the United States, and was therefore properly dismissed.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- decision by Postmaster General and his deputy to cancel contract “was executive in character, not ministerial, and required an exercise of official discretion”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pitney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.