Skip to main content
· 10/13/1994

Wells v. Panola County Bd. of Educ.

Citations

  • 645 So. 2d 883
  • 1994 WL 573322

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Remedies Clause is not abrogated by immunities that were well established at time of Clause's adoption
  • noting that Remedies Clause is not abrogated by immunities that were well-established at time of Clause's adoption
  • stating open court provision did not create unlimited right of access to courts and holding damage cap for claim against School Board did not violate open court provision
  • interpreting Walters as permitting the legislature to “alter or substitute” common law remedies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dan M. Lee, P.J., and Pittman and James L. Roberts, Jr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.