Supreme Court of Georgia· 2/13/1995
Wells v. Jackson
Citations
- 265 Ga. 181
- 453 S.E.2d 690
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- no evidence of actual cancellation of beneficiaries’ names where marks at issue were smudges which in no way obscured those names
- no evidence of actual cancellation of beneficiaries' names where marks at issue were smudges which in no way obscured those names
- “Revocation is not accomplished by the maker’s unsuccessful attempt to destroy or obliterate.”
- “Revocation is not accomplished by the maker’s unsuccessful attempt to destroy or obliterate.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Benham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McIntyre v. McIntyreSupreme Court of Georgia· 1904-05-12· cited 65×
- Hartz v. SobelSupreme Court of Georgia· 1911-07-13· cited 23×
- Morris v. BullockSupreme Court of Georgia· 1937-11-12· cited 13×
- Payne v. PayneSupreme Court of Georgia· 1957-10-11· cited 12×
- King v. BennettSupreme Court of Georgia· 1959-10-09· cited 10×
- Carter v. First United Methodist ChurchSupreme Court of Georgia· 1980-09-17· cited 10×
- Bianchini v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia· 1965-04-09· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.