Wells v. Coyle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding “that a genuine issue of material fact preclude[d] summary judgment” on a false arrest claim
• police dispatcher might violate Fourth Amendment by “maliciously misleading police officers without suspicion of wrongdoing in a manner that leads to another’s detention”
• police dispatcher might violate Fourth Amendment by “maliciously misleading police officers without suspicion of wrongdoing in a manner that leads to another’s detention”
• “In the absence of any case law suggesting that a dispatcher can be held liable for a police officer’s use of excessive force, the Court concludes that any constitutional violation here is not clearly established.”
• “In the absence of any case law suggesting that a dispatcher can be held liable for a police officer’s use of excessive force, the Court concludes that any constitutional violation here is not clearly established.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).