Wells v. Columbus Technical Coll.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying Daubert motion where movant “fail[ed] to explain how Dr. Vinson’s . . . lack of experience within the ladder industry render[ed] him unqualified”
• \[I]t is often the case that experts reach conflicting conclusions based on applying different but nevertheless reliable methodologies to a set of partially known facts.\
• “Indeed, it is often the case that experts reach conflicting conclusions based on applying different but nevertheless reliable methodologies to a set of partially known facts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).