Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 12/19/1984

Wells v. Chrysler Corp.

Citations

  • 15 Ohio St. 3d 21
  • 472 N.E.2d 331
  • 15 Ohio B. 18
  • 1984 Ohio LEXIS 1253

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the purpose of a notice of appeal is to set forth the names of the parties and to advise those parties that an appeal of a particular claim is forthcoming
  • holding that the purpose of a notice of appeal is to set forth the names of the parties and to advise those parties that an appeal of a particular claim is forthcoming
  • holding that the purpose of a notice of appeal is to set forth the names of the parties and to advise those parties that an appeal of a particular claim is forthcoming
  • fact that the notice of appeal “did not contain the name of the appellee-employer in its text and appellee was never designated as the employer” did not defeat jurisdiction
  • fact that the notice of appeal “did not contain the name of the appellee-employer in its text and appellee was never designated as the employer” did not defeat jurisdiction
  • the statutory scheme “requires liberal construction of workers’ compensation statutes in favor of employees”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Celebrezze, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.