Wells Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc. v. Chardon/Hato Rey Partnership, S.E.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that when a general provision conflicts with a specific provision the latter is understood as a limitation on the former
• finding that defined terms indicated by initial capitals should be accorded the their special meaning
• affirming the denial of a motion to compel where the original request was made after the discovery deadline
• affirming summary judgment where appellant was not procedurally prejudiced by the lack of adequate notice or the opportunity “to present evidence in support of its position” (citing P.R. Electric Power Auth., 515 F.3d at 64)
• affirming denial of motion to compel filed after deadline for production requests
• error of sua sponte summary judgment entering without appropriate notice would be harmless if appellant was not deprived of opportunity to present evidence resulting from unfair surprise

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).