Skip to main content
· 5/7/2007

Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. v. Neal

Citations

  • 922 A.2d 538
  • 398 Md. 705
  • 2007 Md. LEXIS 334

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding \a mortgagor may not wield as a sword HUD regulations [but] may assert . . . regulatory noncompliance as a shield against unauthorized foreclosure actions.\
  • “As with all affirmative defenses, [the defendant] bears the burden of proof.”
  • ‘‘we are of the opinion that the violations of the HUD mortgage servicing regulations alleged of [the lender] by [the homeowner] may be asserted effectively as an affirmative defense within the injunctive relief apparatus provided’’ by Maryland statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harrell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.