Wells Fargo Bank Texas, N.A. v. James

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that because the court had original jurisdiction over plaintiff's claims pursuant to the FTCA, the court also had “supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining Defendants and claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a
• FTCA requirement that “‘each claim and each claimant meet the prerequisites for maintaining a suit against the government’ . . . applies without exception” (citation omitted)
• FTCA rule that “‘each claim and each claimant meet the prerequisites for maintaining a suit against the government’ . . . applies without exception” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).