Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Spaulding

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the Hunt test to affirm district court’s conclusions that plaintiffs alleged sufficient, particularized harm to warrant jurisdiction and individual participation not necessary to warrant relief
• applying the Hunt test to affirm district court’s conclusions that plaintiffs alleged sufficient, particularized harm to warrant jurisdiction and individual participation not necessary to warrant relief
• complaint seeking injunctive relief did not require proof of individual damages or otherwise demand participation of the organizational-plaintiff’s members
• complaint seeking injunctive relief did not require proof of individual damages or otherwise demand participation of the organizational-plaintiff’s members
• “[T]he magistrate determined that the Clerk’s ongoing violations reflect the precise political patronage the Consent Decrees seek to end.”
• “Shakman IV,” for clarity’s sake

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).