Skip to main content
· 6/24/2010

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Sessley

Citations

  • 188 Ohio App. 3d 213
  • 935 N.E.2d 70

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a motion to make a document an exhibit to be considered by a jury was not timely when it was made \[a]fter all the evidence had been introduced in the case and the jury had been instructed as to the law\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Connor, McGrath, Tyack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.