Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Mh Sub I, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the appropriate triggering event for any takings claim under the Trails Act occurs when the NITU is issued”
• holding that “the appropriate triggering event for any takings claim under the Trails Act occurs when the NITU is issued.”
• emphasizing that a takings claim accrues when the government deprives the plaintiff of a property interest, regardless of whether that taking is permanent or temporary
• stating that the effect of the NITU is that “the STB retains jurisdiction for possible future railroad use”
• explaining that the NITU “operates to prevent abandonment ... and to preclude the vesting of state law reversionary interests in the right-of-way”
• observing that “the STB retains jurisdiction for possible future railroad use” in Trails Act corridors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).