Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Melahn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding there was continuing equitable authority where plaintiff misrepresented to court that it had sent notice of judgment to movant prior to law day but, in fact, did not actually provide notice until law day
• concluding there was continuing equitable authority where plaintiff misrepresented to court that it had sent notice of judg- ment to movant prior to law day but, in fact, did not actually provide notice until law day
• continuing jurisdiction existed where as part of judgment of strict foreclosure bank was required to send notice to nonappearing defendants before filing certificate of foreclosure and bank falsely certificated to court that notice requirement had been satisfied
• trial court had jurisdiction to open judgment where encumbrancer falsely certified compliance with court's judgment of strict foreclosure
• observing court may set aside strict-foreclosure judgment based on fraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).