WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A., AS TRUSTEE v. RANDOLPH v. COOK

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, absent the plaintiff’s detrimental reliance on her confusion, there is no standing
• holding that, absent the plaintiff’s detrimental reliance on her confusion, there is no standing
• holding that “consult[ing]” with “counsel” is not a concrete harm by itself
• holding that a plaintiff who alleged a debt collector’s letter confused and intimidated her did not establish stand- ing because the plaintiff failed to “tie” her feelings to a concrete injury—even though she hired an attorney
• holding that confusion alone does not satisfy the injury-in-fact prong of standing
• observing that if confusion were a concrete harm, “everyone would have standing to litigate about everything”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).