Wellogix, Inc. v. Accenture, L.L.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the admission of a computer scientist as an expert who initially lacked experience in the software at issue in the case
• “[The] expert . . . [testified] that the company was worth $27.8 million in 2005.”
• “Although Accenture maintains that it was Wellogix’s burden to show that the patents did not cover the same subject matter, Accenture does not cite, nor could we find, case law imposing such a burden.”
• “any exploitation of [a] trade secret that is likely to result in injury to the trade secret owner or enrichment to the defendant is a ‘use,’” including “an act that ‘lower[s] the market value’ of a trade secret”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).