· 10/3/2011
Wellington v. Sexton
Citations
- 181 L. Ed. 2d 158
- 2011 U.S. LEXIS 5233
- 132 S. Ct. 268
- 565 U.S. 889
- 80 U.S.L.W. 3188
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a “but for” rule is not the test of the validity of a condition of restitution
- a \but for\ rule is not the test of the validity of a condition of restitution
- “In California, as in most jurisdictions, it has long been the rule in both civil and criminal cases that evidence that a driver is unlicensed is not admissible on the issue of negligence as the cause of an accident.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.