WellCare of Florida, Inc. v. American International Specialty Lines Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Having concluded that AISLIC had no duty to defend, we likewise conclude that it had no duty to indemnify WellCare for the sums [that WellCare] paid to settle the [underlying] action.”
• “[T]he duty to indemnify is narrower than the duty to defend and thus cannot exist if there is no duty to defend.”
• “[T]he duty to indemnify is narrower than the duty to defend and thus cannot exist if there is no duty to defend.”
• “[T]he duty to indemnify is narrower than the duty to defend and thus cannot exist if there is not duty to defend.”
• “[T]he duty to indemnify is narrower than the duty to defend and thus cannot exist if there is no duty to defend.”
• “[T]he duty to indemnify is narrower than the duty to defend and thus cannot exist if there is no duty to defend.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).