· 3/25/2010
Welker v. LAW OFFICE OF DANIEL J. HORWITZ
Citations
- 699 F. Supp. 2d 1164
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28374
- 2010 WL 1227396
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that failure to include “in writing” requirement violated § 1692g(a)(4)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Irma E. Gonzalez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.