Skip to main content
· 8/4/1978

Welfare of R. L. K.

Citations

  • 269 N.W.2d 367
  • 4 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1539
  • 1978 Minn. LEXIS 1268

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that these factors—commonly known as the Edgar factors from State v. Edgar, 281 Kan. 30, 36, 127 P.3d 986 [2006]— establish a sound benchmark
  • noting that these factors—commonly known as the Edgar factors from State v. Edgar, 281 Kan. 30, 36, 127 P.3d 986 [2006]—establish a sound benchmark
  • noting that these factors—commonly known as the Edgar factors from State v. Edgar, 281 Kan. 30, 36, 127 P.3d 986 [2006]— establish a sound benchmark
  • noting that these considerations— commonly known as the Edgar factors—establish a sound benchmark
  • reversing district court's decision based on an erroneous understanding of the law and remanding for another hearing applying the correct legal standard
  • reversing ruling on motion to withdraw plea based on erroneous understanding of law and remanding for another hearing applying appropriate legal standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scott, Wahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.