Welchel v. Boyter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, in order for contempt to lie, the language of a court order’s commands must be clear and certain
• \One may not be convicted of contempt for violating a court order which fails to tell him in definite terms what he must do.\
• to support contempt finding, language of court order \must be clear and certain rather than implied\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Knight v. Austin
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-02-22· cited 12×
• State v. Sowell
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-08-14· cited 7×
• AMERICAN FEDERAL BANK, FSB v. Kateman
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-04-05· cited 5×
• County of Greenville v. Mann
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-12-03· cited 4×
• Spartanburg Buddhist Center v. Ork
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-07-13· cited 3×
• Western Carolina Regional Sewer Authority v. Bell
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-09-11· cited 2×
• Burnell v. Burnell
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-05-24· cited 1×
• Taylor v. Taylor
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2021-07-07
• Campione v. Best
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2021-12-01
• South Carolina Department of Social Services v. Brock
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-04-25
• In the Matter of the Estate of Chris Combis
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2023-05-03