· 3/6/2007
Welch v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
Citations
- 480 F.3d 942
- 40 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1001
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 5194
- 2007 WL 656390
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that courts may apply a percentage reduction, but only to hours actually block billed
- holding that the use of block-billing does not justify an across-the-board reduction or rejection of all hours
- holding that an ERISA plaintiff may conduct discovery in order 14 to show a conflict of interest
- recognizing the block billing may inflate fees by 10-30% and approving a 20% reduction for block-billed time
- concluding “the requested fees 17 of $375 and $400 per hour were established as being in line with prevailing community rates”
- recognizing a district court’s “authority to reduce hours that are billed in block format”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.