Skip to main content
· 3/6/2007

Welch v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

Citations

  • 480 F.3d 942
  • 40 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1001
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 5194
  • 2007 WL 656390

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that courts may apply a percentage reduction, but only to hours actually block billed
  • holding that the use of block-billing does not justify an across-the-board reduction or rejection of all hours
  • holding that an ERISA plaintiff may conduct discovery in order 14 to show a conflict of interest
  • recognizing the block billing may inflate fees by 10-30% and approving a 20% reduction for block-billed time
  • concluding “the requested fees 17 of $375 and $400 per hour were established as being in line with prevailing community rates”
  • recognizing a district court’s “authority to reduce hours that are billed in block format”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.