Welch v. Keene Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, for a breach of warranty claim, “a manufacturer has a duty to warn only as to those dangers about which the manufacturer actually knew or about which it reasonably should have known”
• applying substantial factor test to multiple defendants whose successive conduct led to the plaintiffs injuiy
• “It is enough, however, to reach the jury that [the plaintiff] show that he worked with, or in close proximity to, the defendants’ asbestos products.”
• “It is enough ... to reach the jury that [the plaintiff] show that [she] worked with, or in close proximity to, the defendants’ asbestos products”
• simply because a witness’s testimony goes to the “ultimate issue” of the case does not make it inadmissible
• simply because a witness’s testimony goes to the “ultimate issue” of the case does not make it inadmissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).