Welch v. Georgia Department of Transportation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “because the [plaintiffs] did not strictly comply with the statutory provisions for sending ante litem notice, the trial court had no subject matter jurisdiction over the suit”
• holding that “because the [plaintiffs] did not strictly comply with the statutory provisions for sending ante litem notice, the trial court had no subj ect matter jurisdiction over the suit” (punctuation omitted)
• holding, in context of Georgia Tort Claims Act, that because the plaintiff “did not strictly comply with the statutory provisions for sending ante litem notice, the trial court had no subject matter jurisdiction over the suit” (punctuation omitted)
• holding, in context of Georgia Tort Claims Act, that because the plaintiff “did not strictly comply with the statutory provisions for sending ante litem notice, the trial court had no subject matter jurisdiction over the suit” (punctuation omitted)
• “We review the trial court’s ruling on a motion to dismiss under the de novo standard of review.” (punctuation omitted)
• “We review the trial court’s ruling on a motion to dismiss under the de novo standard of review.” (punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).