Skip to main content
· 7/1/1863

Welch v. Allington

Citations

  • 23 Cal. 322

Syllabus

<p>A BEizra in debt to B, executes to him his promissory note for the amount due. A afterwards gives to B, C’s note for the same amount, and B surrenders up A’s note, which is destroyed. C’s note is not paid at maturity, and B sues A upon the original note, which had been given up : held, that the action could be maintained, as there was no express agreement between A and B that C’s note was to pay the debt, or that the note of A was to be extinguished by C’s note: keld, further, that the reception of C’s note, in the absence of any express agreement to the contrary, only operated as an extension of the time of payment of A’s note until the maturity of C’s.</p>

Judges: Crocker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.