Skip to main content
· 4/7/1913

Welch Manufacturing Co. v. Young

Citations

  • 229 U.S. 611
  • 33 S. Ct. 771
  • 57 L. Ed. 1351
  • 1913 U.S. LEXIS 2771

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding pursuant to Canon 3 that recusal was not warranted by fact that judge’s husband had remote business relationship with one party to divorce
  • twenty-nine month delay in ruling on a divorce petition is unreasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.