Skip to main content
· 3/16/1915

Welborn v. Whayne

Citations

  • 163 Ky. 558
  • 174 S.W. 3
  • 1915 Ky. LEXIS 263

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that, to prevail on a claim of attempted monopolization,- a plaintiff must prove “(1) a specific intent to monopolize a relevant market, (2) predatory or anticompetitive acts; and (3) a dangerous probability of successful monopolization”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carroll

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.