Skip to main content
· 2/9/1990

Welborn v. United States

Citations

  • 736 F. Supp. 1070
  • 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5773
  • 1990 WL 65275

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that block-billing 18 makes it “nearly impossible for the Court to determine the reasonableness of the hours 19 spent on each task.”
  • finding hours two attorneys spent on 26 the same task “duplicative”
  • “[Plaintiff] has failed 3 to specifically cite any applicable legal authority supporting his claim of entitlement to fees 4 for preparing the motion and memorandum for award of attorneys’ fees, as required by 5 LRCiv 54.2(c)(2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Theis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.