Skip to main content
· 6/5/1992

Welborn v. Shipman

Citations

  • 608 So. 2d 334
  • 1992 WL 120010

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that until an adverse ruling was made on the plaintiff's motion for a new evidentiary hearing, the plaintiff did not sustain any injury for which damages could be awarded
  • finding statute of limitations did not begin to run until final judgment was entered, although plaintiff was aware of attorney’s failure to present crucial evidence prior to that date

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ingram

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.