Skip to main content
· 7/1/1991

Weizenbaum v. Weizenbaum

Citations

  • 407 S.E.2d 37
  • 12 Va. App. 899
  • 8 Va. Law Rep. 232
  • 1991 Va. App. LEXIS 157

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the legal principles determined in an interlocutory order substantially dictated the final order -7- in the case
  • holding that an order granting a divorce and denying periodic spousal support but taking under advisement wife’s motion for lump sum alimony was a final, appealable order as to the divorce on the date of entry
  • holding that an order granting a divorce and denying periodic spousal support but taking under advisement a motion for lump sum alimony was a final, appealable order as to the divorce on the date of entry
  • where the legal principles determined in an interlocutory order were held to substantially dictate the final order in the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.