Skip to main content
· 2/22/1990

Weitzer v. Lyman (In re Lyman)

Citations

  • 113 B.R. 729
  • 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 731

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a public-use designation on a recorded plat, or a public-use designation on a plat or map that is expressly referenced in a deed, is strong evidence that the platter intended to make a public dedication, albeit not necessarily dispositive
  • defining “dedication” as “the donation of land or creation of an easement for public use”
  • a plat not conclusive but is among the evidence to be considered in determining whether the creator in fact intended an implied interest
  • declining to address statutory dedication where the parties did not
  • declining to address statutory dedication where the parties did not

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Proctor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.