Skip to main content
· 9/21/2000

Weisshaus v. Swiss Bankers Ass'n

Citations

  • 225 F.3d 191
  • 2000 WL 1363395

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \using [evidence of] bad acts directly as propensity evidence [in closing argument] is forbidden and prejudicial\
  • stating victim must attack or at least strike defendant to qualify as sudden combat
  • \judges should proceed with caution when deviating from our model jury instructions on homicide\
  • prior bad act evidence admissible to rebut defendant's contentions made in course of trial
  • \We review questions of admissibility ... under an abuse of discretion standard\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cabranes, Pooler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.