Skip to main content
· 10/3/2007

Weisser v. PNC BANK, NA

Citations

  • 967 So. 2d 327
  • 32 A.L.R. 6th 787
  • 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 15594
  • 2007 WL 2848118

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a forum selection clause was mandatory because it contained “words of exclusivity”
  • parties agreed “to the exclusive jurisdiction of United States District Court for the District of Kansas or the District Court of Johnson County, Kansas”
  • “[I]n Florida, contracting parties are permitted to agree that any litigation stemming from their contract must be heard in a specific forum.”
  • “We do not agree with the Second District's position in American Boxing that because the forum selection clause contains the words 'consent' and 'shall' this creates an ambiguity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gersten, C.J., and Shepherd and Rothenberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.