Skip to main content
· 1/14/2010

Weissburg v. Lancaster School District

Citations

  • 591 F.3d 1255
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 882
  • 2010 WL 114960

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that parents who 19 litigate their children’s IDEA claims pro se are not eligible to receive attorneys’ fees
  • declining to extend Kay to the category of nonparent relatives under the IDEA
  • declining to extend Kay to the category of nonparent relatives under the IDEA
  • finding prevailing party status because the judgment “entitle[d]” the student to a specific remedy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harry Pregerson, Stephen Reinhardt and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.