· 1/14/2010
Weissburg v. Lancaster School District
Citations
- 591 F.3d 1255
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 882
- 2010 WL 114960
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that parents who 19 litigate their children’s IDEA claims pro se are not eligible to receive attorneys’ fees
- declining to extend Kay to the category of nonparent relatives under the IDEA
- declining to extend Kay to the category of nonparent relatives under the IDEA
- finding prevailing party status because the judgment “entitle[d]” the student to a specific remedy
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harry Pregerson, Stephen Reinhardt and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.