Weiss v. Zwicker & Associates P.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• quoting Sparkman v. Zwicker & Associates, P.C., 374 F.Supp.2d 293, 302 (E.D.N.Y. 2005) and 15 U.S.C. § 1692k(b)(1
• finding a $500 statutory damage award \appropriate\ where the plaintiff \suffered no actual damages\
• finding a $500 statutory damage award “appropriate” where the plaintiff “suffered no actual damages”
• (quoting Sparkman v. Zwicker & Associates, P.C., 374 F.Supp.2d 293, 302 (E.D.N.Y. 2005) and 15 U.S.C. § 1692k(b)(1)). Based on the Court’s finding that Defendants violated FDCPA Section 1692e(5) and e(13
• awarding $500 where there was one letter sent in violation, it was not threatening in tone, there was no evidence that the violation was intentional, and the plaintiff suffered no actual damages
• awarding $500 where there was one letter sent in violation, it was not threatening in tone, there was no evidence that the violation was intentional, and the plaintiff suffered no actual damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).