Weiss v. PPG Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “as a rebuttal witness, [an expert] may criticize [plaintiffs] damage theories and calculations without offering alternatives”
• suggesting that until Rule 26(a)(2)(b) is modified to include a safe harbor provision or a meet and confer provision as a prerequisite to exclusion for an inadequate disclosure, “counsel would seem well advised to err on the side of overinclusiveness”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).