Weiss v. Park Towers S. Co., LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence of technological savvy supported jury verdict for knowing distribution of child pornography
• holding that possession of child pornography is not a lesser-included offense of distribution of the same
• holding that “the defendant’s unlawful possession of a multitude of files on two interlinked computers located in separate rooms within the same dwelling gave rise to only a single count of unlawful possession under section 2252(a)(4)(B)”
• finding that prohibition against “knowingly possess[ing] . . . one or more books, magazines, . . .” could not constitutionally support multiple possession charges
• explaining that, in identifying appropriate unit of prosecution, “Congress’s intent is paramount”
• identifying “absolutely no basis” for inferring that distribution enhancement did not apply to defendant convicted of distribution crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).