Skip to main content
· 7/9/1903

Weiss v. Marks

Citations

  • 206 Pa. 513
  • 56 A. 59
  • 1903 Pa. LEXIS 750

Syllabus

<p>Payment — Accord and satisfaction — Payment before debt is due.</p> <p>The rule that payment of a smaller sum is not a consideration to support an accord and satisfaction in regard to a larger sum due, has always been regarded as moi'e logical than just or businesslike, and even small circumstances of variation have always been held sufficient to prevent its application. Hence a payment in advance, no matter how short a time, has been uniformly held to constitute a good consideration.</p>

Judges: Brown, Fell, Mestrezat, Mitchell, Potter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.