Skip to main content
· 6/2/1961

Weiss Noodle Company v. Golden Cracknel and Specialty Company

Citations

  • 290 F.2d 845
  • 48 C.C.P.A. 1004

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying ban on trademarking generic names to foreign equivalents, and holding that “ha-lush-ka,” phonetic spelling of Hungarian word for “egg noodles,” is non-protectible
  • HA-LUSH-KA refused registration as phonetic equivalent of Hungarian word for noodles, despite some evidence of acquired distinctiveness
  • “Ha-Lush-Ka” a generic name for haluska, the Hungarian word for egg noodle
  • “no one can be granted the exclusive use of the name of an article”
  • HA-LUSH-KA held to be the generic equivalent of the Hungarian word “haluska”
  • denying registration of a generically descriptive mark in Hungarian

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Worley, Rich, Martin, Smith, Kirkpatrick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.