Weisman v. Blue Shield of California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “a conscious and callous indifference to, or disregard of, probable harm” to 9 | support an award of punitive damages
• discussing that punitive damages would be 9 appropriate if the “entire nature of defendant’s operation . . . reflected defendant’s 10 overriding concern for a minimum-expense operation, regardless of the peril”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).