Weisgram v. Marley Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellate court can enter judgment for party when it determines that substantial evidence did not support jury verdict
• holding that appellate court can enter judgment for party when it determines that substantial evidence did not support jury verdict
• holding that a district court, when considering post-trial motions for judgment as a matter of law, may disregard “testimony erroneously admitted”
• holding that authority of federal courts of appeals to direct entry of judgment extends to cases in which, on excision of expert testimony erroneously admitted, there remains insufficient evidence to support the verdict
• holding that authority of federal courts of appeals to direct entry of judgment extends to cases in which, on excision of expert testimony erroneously admitted, there remains insufficient evidence to support the verdict
• holding that authority of federal courts of appeals to direct entry of judgment extends to cases in which, on excision of expert testimony erroneously admitted, there remains insufficient evidence to support the verdict

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).