Supreme Court· 2/22/2000

Weisgram v. Marley Co.

Citations

528 U.S. 440
120 S. Ct. 1011
145 L. Ed. 2d 958
2000 U.S. LEXIS 1011

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that appellate court can enter judgment for party when it determines that substantial evidence did not support jury verdict
holding that appellate court can enter judgment for party when it determines that substantial evidence did not support jury verdict
holding that a district court, when considering post-trial motions for judgment as a matter of law, may disregard “testimony erroneously admitted”
holding that authority of federal courts of appeals to direct entry of judgment extends to cases in which, on excision of expert testimony erroneously admitted, there remains insufficient evidence to support the verdict
holding that authority of federal courts of appeals to direct entry of judgment extends to cases in which, on excision of expert testimony erroneously admitted, there remains insufficient evidence to support the verdict
holding that authority of federal courts of appeals to direct entry of judgment extends to cases in which, on excision of expert testimony erroneously admitted, there remains insufficient evidence to support the verdict

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

210 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Weisgram v. Marley Co.

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.