Weisgold v. Kiamesha Concord, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that abrasions to the face, head and tricep bruises, and mental trauma were minor injuries
• noting that a plaintiff’s failure to seek medical treatment suggested the injury was minor
• distinguishing Richard and finding qualified immunity because Richard “involved more severe and less appropriate uses of force” than used by the Buehler officers
• affirming dismissal of First Amendment retaliatory arrest claim because officers had probable cause to arrest plaintiff filming police
• affirming dismissal of First Amendment retaliatory arrest claim because officers had probable cause to arrest plaintiff exercising First Amendment right in manner that interfering with officers’ official duties
• asking, but not answering, “How close is ‘too close’ such that the filming, however well-intentioned, becomes hazardous, diverting officers’ attention and impeding their ability to perform their duties in fast-moving, highly charged situations?”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).