Weisblatt v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing UTPCPL knowing misrepresentation claim and concluding that omissions are actionable when “in breach of a duty to speak”
• dismissing UTPCPL knowing misrepresentation claim and concluding that omissions are actionable when “in breach of a duty to speak”
• “[A]n omission or nondisclosure is only actionable under the [tort] of negligent misrepresentation if there is a duty to speak”
• \[A]n omission or nondisclosure is only actionable under the [tort] of negligent misrepresentation if there is a duty to speak\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).