· 3/20/1968
Weisbart v. Flohr
Citations
- 260 Cal. App. 2d 281
- 67 Cal. Rptr. 114
- 1968 Cal. App. LEXIS 1854
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- counsel’s repeated use of numerous props during closing arguments constituted improper “diversionary exercise” that created circus-like atmosphere in courtroom
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Conley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.