Weirton Steel Co. v. Isbrandtsen-Moller Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the plaintiff “has the burden of proof and certainly had better access to the evidence”
• stating that it is “not unreasonable” to ask a plaintiff, “which has the burden of proof and certainly had better access to the evidence,” to show that it was “obliged to make an allowance of some kind” because of the damaged goods

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).