Weinstock v. Holden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the use of \should\ in the judicial recusal rules was \non-mandatory\ leaving it to the \sound judgment of those who followed to determine whether recusal was required in a particular case.\
• “The rule of necessity has been invoked where disqualifications exist as to all members of the state judiciary who would normally hear a matter.”
• “Our predecessors thought it sufficient to use the word ‘should,’ leaving to the sound judgment of 9 those who followed to determine whether [a judge’s] recusal was required in a particular case.”
• applying the rule to consider a resolution affecting judicial pay
• applying the rule to consider a resolution affecting judicial pay
• applying the rule to consider a resolution affecting judicial pay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).